• Home
  • About
  • Email List
  • Past Speakers
  • SFNHS Coordinator
  • Upcoming Speakers

SF Natural History Series

A lecture series exploring nature in the San Francisco Bay Area

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Next Lecture: May 19th — Who Killed Off the Oysters of SF Bay?
Next Lecture: June 16th – Getting to the Bottom of the Bay – Subtleties of the Subtidal »

The Mysterious Native Oysters of San Francisco Bay

May 24, 2011 by Adrian Cotter

It’s a long held belief around here that the oysters native in San Francisco Bay were once abundant, and that their loss may have had a great negative impact on the bay. Our speaker Andrew Cohen believed it, but became curious about one particular question. Why did they disappear?

The native oyster was rediscovered in 1999, and since then people have set about reestablishing their abundance. The only problem Andrew found with this was that it seemed that they had never quite left. Since 1912, the native oyster seems present in oyster census data through the whole century. They’d never disappeared to being with.

But still, the oysters in these counts were still not abundant. The story goes that until the mid 19th century the oyster was there in abundance, that it was the “dominant commercial fishery” (from an NOAA report). There have been various explanations for the lack of oysters: pollution caused the decline, or mining sediments covering up the oyster beds, or perhaps over-harvesting. Cohen set about investigating these explanations.

He looked at the times before and after 1850 (1769-1850 and 1850-1912) , to look at what might have caused the decline. His first thought, as an expert in invasive species, was that perhaps the Spanish or other colonists brought something with them. But as much as he would have liked to have found an explanation there he did not. Pollution as an explanation also fell by the wayside. There were no studies, no specific causes ever listed.

The sleepy village of yerba buena - about to decimate the oysters?

Hydraulic mining sediment also did not seem to be a likely explanation. The sediment peaked in 1890, the sediment was not evenly distributed, and in some places the sediment even decreased.

And in nowhere in the literature of eating after 1850 did anyone ever make much mention of the native oyster. Imports from Japan and the east coast got the lion share of the press.  Furthermore, any over-harvesting impacts should have radiated outward from populated areas of the time. But there is no evidence of that.

So in Cohen’s mind, suddenly a different question arose. Were in fact the native oysters ever abundant?

He now dug deeper, looking at contemporary records, harvest records, laws & lawsuits, shell middens, and natural shell deposits. The earliest statement for abundance it turns out came in 1962 with no sources. The original source for “significant harvest” of native oysters seems to have come in 1979. There didn’t seem to be much in the way of contemporary records at all.

And nowhere else did he find any evidence of abundance. Unlike other oyster areas like Washington, there were not laws on the books about native oyster beds and harvesting. There were no lawsuits over ownership.

Finally though, looking at shell middens and shell deposits, he did find evidence for abundance. But it was not what he expected. Oysters were there in abundance, but more than 2000 years ago. The shell middens of the current era are full of clams and mussels. The large abundant oyster deposits were deep with in the bay’s sediments. The data matched each other pretty well. It seems the 1759-1850 abundance of the native oysters was something that was made up.

Andrew Cohen still left us with a mystery (and there are those who dispute Cohen’s evidence) why did they become less abundant 2000 years ago. There is no evidence that they were over-harvested by the Native Americans. Something seems to have changed about the bay, perhaps related to climatic events of the times. But that is perhaps a later talk.

The question for us now, is what about efforts to reintroduce the oyster to San Francisco Bay? Something else is at work to keep the oyster less than abundant, and it is not likely humans, do these little mollusks need our help?

For more information about the San Francisco Bay Estuary, check out “An Introduction to the San Francisco Bay Estuary” (download the PDF).

Andrew Cohen is the Director of the Center for Research on Aquatic Bioinvasions (CRAB) in Richmond. His research includes the science and policy of invasions, and he helped write California’s ballast water laws. He’s received a Pew Fellowship in Marine Conservation, the San Francisco BayKeeper’s Environmental Achievement Award, and in 1994 was named by the Bay Chapter of the Sierra Club as the Best Public Official for the Environment.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Lecture Notes |

  • SFNHS

    Our lecture series explores all aspects of nature in the Bay Area, and seeks to understand our impact both past and present on those natural systems, and their impact on us.
  • Find Us Elsewhere

    • Facebook
    • Google+
    • Twitter
  • Local Science & History

    • Ask a Scientist SF
    • California Center for Natural History
    • California Naturalist Program
    • Friends of Five Creeks
    • Nature in the City
    • Shaping SF
    • The Long Now Seminars
    • Think Walks
    • Urban Adventures for Kids
  • Our Hosts

    • Exploratorium Bay Observatory Gallery
    • Green Apple Books
    • Rotary Nature Center
    • SF Public Library
    • The Randall Museum
  • Science in Other Cities

    • Bay to Beach Life
    • NYC Wildlife
  • Speaker

    • Cartographer's Notebook
    • Keith Hansen
    • Marin Carbon Project
    • Nowtopians
  • SF Naturalist

    • RT @LuchaLivre: @jmdeitz4 @shutupaida @Trey_Gutierrez3 https://t.co/mkAC8VQV0S "The Oakland police tweeted Friday night that they did not… 10 months ago
    • RT @davidtlang: Excited to point you to a new citizen science + technology initiative to monitor coral reefs around the world: https://t.c… 11 months ago
    • First day of #CityNatureChallenge2020 went for a nice bike ride to mostly lonely places. Me and a fisherman watchin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 11 months ago
  • Archives

    • July 2018
    • January 2017
    • June 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • October 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • March 2009

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    <span>%d</span> bloggers like this: