• Home
  • About
  • Email List
  • Past Speakers
  • SFNHS Coordinator
  • Upcoming Speakers

SF Natural History Series

A lecture series exploring nature in the San Francisco Bay Area

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Next Lecture – Sep 18th: How we’d like all our buildings to work
Living in the Plate Boundary and Through the Ice Ages »

Keeping San Francisco Well Watered

September 15, 2014 by Adrian Cotter

Spreck Rosekrans came to us August 21st, 2014 to make the case for restoring Hetch Hetchy from reservoir to valley. The dam just passed its 100th anniversary in 2013, but what was hugely controversial at that time (more than 200 newspapers opposed, and John Muir famously broken-hearted by the decision) is now something of which most San Franciscans are proud.

Spreck spent only a little of his time on the “why” of making the effort. We lost this special place, and many people regretted the choice to dam it at the time, and today we have a chance to correct that mistake and restore an iconic place. To do that would show not just values, but also show that we can make meaningful water reform (not something that seems to come easily to Californians). The arguments (which Spreck also layed out) against it are many — people feel that the water is SF’s birthright, that Hetch Hetchy was a swamp, that we are actually protecting the valley, and there’s hydro power from the dam, the cost of removing it, and that we need more storage not less.

The main thrust of the talk was on the practical question of: if we removed the dam, how would we actually supply the water coming into the pipes of the 2.4 million people? It is not a pie-in-the-sky, wishy-washy notion as one might first think. EDF hired 2 mainstream engineering firms, and one law firm to look into what it would take (this resulted in a publication called Paradise Regained — the summary on this page gives a pretty good idea of what is proposed).

The amount of water involved is not the biggest. Of 5 big water projects over the last 22 years, Hetch Hetchy would involve less water than 4 (Delta ESA work, Central Valley wetlands, Trinity River, and rivers in the Central Valley). It would mean juggling water from various sources, doing what is known as “water banking”, taking more from the Cherry reservoir. Looking at the dry years, that kind of work (with the removal of the dam) would get is to around 80%.

The last 20% would take working to be more efficient with the water we have, from farming practices, to recycling, to just plain using less. These are things that of course are not easy, but they are things that we can do — and given current state of our reservoirs maybe things we will have to do anyway. At the end of the day though, we could have our cake and eat it too.

Hetch Hetchy left alone will be with us a long time – unlike other dams, silt does not seem to be a great problem there. Choosing to restore the valley to its former glory would no doubt have its complications and difficulties, but that choice is not just a fantasy.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Lecture Notes | Tagged notes, san francisco, water | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on September 15, 2014 at 10:28 pm amy

    One of the main reasons why I cannot get behind this idea is that there are so many other bigger, pressing conservation and environmental issues to fight. I feel like it takes resources and time away from dealing with other environmental issues.


  2. on September 15, 2014 at 10:32 pm Adrian Cotter

    That’s a fair comment (one we did not really address that night) and one I was kind of alluding to in noting that it was a choice.
    One reason I think the Prop F thing happened when it was because they were trying to take advantage of the work the SFPUC was going to be doing in retrofitting. He said that he wished they had done things a little differently.



Comments are closed.

  • SFNHS

    Our lecture series explores all aspects of nature in the Bay Area, and seeks to understand our impact both past and present on those natural systems, and their impact on us.
  • Find Us Elsewhere

    • Facebook
    • Google+
    • Twitter
  • Local Science & History

    • Ask a Scientist SF
    • California Center for Natural History
    • California Naturalist Program
    • Friends of Five Creeks
    • Nature in the City
    • Shaping SF
    • The Long Now Seminars
    • Think Walks
    • Urban Adventures for Kids
  • Our Hosts

    • Exploratorium Bay Observatory Gallery
    • Green Apple Books
    • Rotary Nature Center
    • SF Public Library
    • The Randall Museum
  • Science in Other Cities

    • Bay to Beach Life
    • NYC Wildlife
  • Speaker

    • Cartographer's Notebook
    • Keith Hansen
    • Marin Carbon Project
    • Nowtopians
  • SF Naturalist

    • RT @Sierra_Jobs: Are you interested in developing web applications, and shaping technical solutions for complex use cases at a mission-cent… 6 months ago
    • @Longreads @jkehe @WIRED This does just essentially seem like a reboot of intelligent design. Why is it easier to b… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 11 months ago
    • My couple minutes of Corvid fame on @kalw's @CrosscurrentsFM this week -- shoutout to friends who clued me in to th… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 year ago
  • Archives

    • July 2018
    • January 2017
    • June 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • October 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • March 2009

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • SF Natural History Series
    • Join 35 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • SF Natural History Series
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: